Don't have a TCI SuperCoder account yet? Become a Member >>

Regular Price: $24.95

Ask An Expert Starting at $24.95
Have a medical coding or compliance question? Don’t sacrifice your valuable time to endless research. Choose Ask an Expert to get clear answers from the TCI SuperCoder team. And here’s a tip for the budget-conscious: Select the 12-question pack to get the best rate per question!

Browse Past Questions By Specialty

+View all

Simple Versus Intermediate

Karin Posted Tue 14th of August, 2012 18:39:32 PM

please review this note and respond on which laceration repair your would use and if a e/m is billable with the laceration repair code. Thxs!

HPI: 63 year old wo present to the ED with laceration to the posterior aspect of his right ankle, approximately 3 cm. He was setting in a modified camp cahir tonight which had as its base an old disc. In leaning back the disc struck his ankle and he suffered this laceration. He is able to ambulate without any difficulty.

On presentation the wound is widely gaping with dorsiflexion however the Achilles tendon appears fully intact to clnic evaluation wound is then cleansed aggressively with Hibiclinse, anesthetized and carefully inspected. There was a moderate amount of metallic debris noted within the wound. It was irrigated and directly removed. Wound appears clean at this time. The depth of the wound was inspected noting that is is just above the Achilles tendon. The tendon is not violated. A series of 3-0 Prolene interrupted sutures, dressed with Neosporin, gauze, 2 in Kling and 2 in Ace wrap.

Imp: Laceration, ankle
Plan: Routine suture care, minimize ambulation, especially dorsiflexion such as with inclines, sand, stairs. Sutures out in 10 days. Watch for signs or symptoms of infection. Tetanus shot given tonight.

SuperCoder Answered Tue 14th of August, 2012 18:56:14 PM

" moderate amount of metallic debris noted within the wound. It was irrigated and directly removed." qualifies for 12031 here. Choose appropriate E/M code with Modifier 25 based on the parameters described in the report.

Karin Posted Tue 14th of August, 2012 19:02:13 PM

Thank on the repair answer, but on the e/m are you saying that there is a separately identifiable e/m that is billable on this patient? We sometimes argue that there has to be another dx to bill an additional e/m but I have heard that is not true. Would you just give me some insight on how you look for the ability to bill a separate e/m on this record? thxs

SuperCoder Answered Wed 15th of August, 2012 21:50:50 PM

According to CPT, modifier -25 is used to indicate that an E&M service was performed on the same day as a procedure. It is defined as: "Significant, separately identifiable E&M service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service." The diagnosis for both services may be the same, but the E&M service must be separate and distinct.

The Medicare Claims Processing Manual tells us that the evaluation and decision to perform the service is included in the payment for the service. Per Medicare Claims Processing Manual (100-04) Section 40.1 (B) Services not included in the global surgical package:

"These services may be paid for separately: The initial consultation or evaluation of the problem by the surgeon to determine the need for surgery. Please note that this policy only applies to major surgical procedures. The initial evaluation is always included in the allowance for a minor surgical procedure ..."

And the NCCI edits say: Per CCI (chapter 11, Letter R.):

"The decision to perform a minor surgical procedure is included in the payment for the minor surgical procedure and should not be reported separately as an E&M service. However, a significant and separately identifiable E&M service unrelated to the decision to perform the minor surgical procedure is separately reportable with modifier -25."

Use modifier -25 only on E&M services, when a procedure with 0 or 10 global days is performed by the same physician on the same date of service. Use it only when the E&M service is separate and distinct. What does that mean? It means when it is medically necessary to evaluate the patient — not just the site of the procedure — prior to performing the service. Evaluating the site of the procedure and making the decision to perform the procedure is included in the payment for the procedure itself.

You would be likely to perform and document a separate E&M in these cases:

• New onset post-menopausal bleeding, when an endometrial biopsy is performed after the evaluation;

• Patient presents with anemia and bleeding, and a surgeon decides to perform an endoscopy; and

• Initial evaluation for a non-healing wound, and a procedure on the wound itself.

You would be less likely to report both an E&M and a procedure in these clinical situations:

• For a planned, repeat procedure such as wound care;

• For a patient who presents for the procedure, i.e., "Patient presents today for a LEEP after an abnormal pap smear";

• For minor procedures such as lesion destruction; and

• For planned, routine foot care provided to nursing home patients.

It may be difficult for a clinician or coder to decide if the visit meets the criteria of separate and distinct. Look at the note, and highlight the portion of the note that references the E&M service. Is there any reference to the E&M service, or is it all related to the procedure? If the key components of an E&M service are documented, do they show that the physician evaluation happened on that day? Or do they simply repeat a past history: "I saw this patient last week with a non-healing wound, debrided it, and asked him to return for another evaluation and debridement." Restating the history and plan developed at a previous visit does not count as a separate E&M service.

Related Topics