Answer: You can count the information in the assessment as a condition status update. The otolaryngologist may organize the notes in any manner he finds practical. For instance: He may update the illness(es) in the assessment section, rather than in the HPI at the top of the note, although for audit purposes it may be helpful to reference them in the HPI section, too.
Important: Documentation should clearly indicate the chronic conditions that are updated. The otolaryngologist must mention the status of the condition, such as -Allergic rhinitis, stable. Continue medications as prescribed.- Simply listing the condition on the assessment is insufficient documentation for an update.
Tip: Using the 1997 guidelines may help you report higher-level services for patients with chronic conditions, such as allergies and diabetes, that affect treatment plans. Unlike the 1995 version, the 1997 history elements don't require the four elements of HPI for an extended level of HPI because you can use the status of three or more chronic conditions. Therefore, the 1997 guidelines may allow you to code a higher-level E/M code for encounters that involve periodic prescription renewals without the physician having to go into as much detail. But remember that medical necessity must ultimately drive the visit's history and examination levels.
Do not mix components of the 1995 and 1997 guidelines--you must pick one and stick to it throughout the chart.