Ask an Expert  The hotline to leaders in specialty coding advice.

About this Question

  • Posted by ROBIN BRIDGES 3 months ago. There are 4 posts. The latest reply is from ROBIN BRIDGES.
  1. PROCEDURE:
    1. Laparoscopic-assisted robotic tubal reanastomosis.
    2. Chromotubation .
    3. Intraoperative consult with colorectal surgeon,

    ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: 100 mL.

    URINE OUTPUT: 125 mL.

    IV FLUID: 3000 mL.

    DRAINS: Foley removed at end of procedure.

    COMPLICATIONS: None.

    INDICATIONS: A 29-year-old P3-0-1-3 with history of
    postpartum Parkland tubal ligation who desires future pregnancy, declines in
    vitro fertilization prior to tubal reanastomosis attempt.

    FINDINGS: Normal post Parkland tubes bilaterally.
    Right tube with adhesions to the round ligament and pubic symphysis, normal
    fimbriae bilaterally, dye present through bilateral tubes after anastomosis,
    bilateral normal ovaries, uterus globular, 10-12 week size. A large 5 cm liver
    mass in lobe 4B. This mass was examined by colorectal surgeon, who recommended outpatient follow-up with liver protocol MRI.

    SPECIMEN REMOVED: Bilateral tubal resection portions.

    TECHNIQUE: The patient was taken to the operating room
    where general endotracheal anesthesia was initiated without complication. The
    patient was placed in Allen stirrups in the dorsal lithotomy position and arms
    were tucked at her side. She was prepped and draped in the normal sterile
    fashion. A Foley catheter was inserted into the bladder. A metal bivalved
    speculum was placed in the vagina and the cervix was visualized anteriorly. A
    single-tooth tenaculum was placed on the anterior lip of the cervix. Attempt
    was made to pass the sound through the cervix which was unsuccessful, so Pratt
    dilator was used to dilate the cervix and then the sound was able to pass
    through with ease. She sounded to 10 cm. A HUMI uterine manipulator was then
    advanced into the uterus. The tenaculum and speculum were removed from the
    vagina. Attention was then turned to the abdomen where a supraumbilical
    incision was made approximately 5 cm above the umbilicus. A 12 mm port was
    placed under direct visualization with the laparoscope. Abdomen was then
    insufflated with CO2. Lateral ports were then placed, a right lateral port was
    placed approximately 10 cm lateral to the umbilical port, this was also a 12 mm
    port. An additional left lateral port was also placed 10 cm from the umbilical
    port. This is an 8 mm port and an additional 8 mm port was placed
    approximately 10 cm below the left lateral port. Another 8 mm port was placed
    in the right lower quadrant. These were all done under direct visualization.
    The pelvis was then surveyed with the above findings. At this time the robot
    was docked and the arms were connected to the ports. Instruments were then
    placed through the ports. Attention was turned to the left tube which was
    gently grasped and elevated. Both segments of the tube were visualized.
    Portions of the left tube at the site of the previous ligation were excised to
    leave healthy tube. A #2 nylon was used as a stent to connect the 2 portions
    of the tube. The tube was then reapproximated first with 5-0 Vicryl to
    reapproximate the tubal serosa adjacent to the tubes to decrease tension on the
    tubes. The tube was then reapproximated with 6-0 Vicryl in a circumferential
    manner in the tissue just adjacent to the lumen and then 5-0 Vicryl was used to
    reapproximate the serosa in interrupted fashion around the tube. This stent
    was then removed from the tube. Attention was then turned to the right tube
    which was noted to be adhesed to the round ligament and the pubic symphysis.
    These adhesions were taken down with the bipolar and scissors. The tube was
    then free. In a similar fashion the ends of the tube at the site of the old
    tubal ligation were excised to leave healthy tube. A #2-0 nylon was used as a
    stent and guided through both ends of the tube to help reapproximate. 5-0
    Vicryl was used to reapproximate the tubal serosa adjacent to the tubes to
    decrease tension on the tubes in an interrupted fashion. The tube was then
    reapproximated with 6-0 Vicryl in a circumferential manner by suturing the
    tissue adjacent to the lumen, then 5-0 Vicryl was used to reapproximate the
    serosa in an interrupted fashion. The stent was then removed from the tube.
    At this time indigo carmine was injected through the HUMI into the uterus and
    dye was noted to flow out of bilateral tubes. The uterus and tubes were
    reinspected. Areas of the uterine serosa were noted to be oozy, this was
    stopped with electrocautery and noted to be hemostatic. The pelvis was then
    copiously irrigated with saline and suctioned and the area was hemostatic. The
    instruments were removed from the ports and the robot was undocked. The
    laparoscope was then advanced into the umbilical port to survey the pelvis
    which again was noted to be hemostatic. Surveillance of the upper abdomen was
    done which found a large 5 cm liver mass on the 4B lobe. Colorectal Surgery, scrubbed in to examine the mass and it was determined that
    the patient would require outpatient imaging with MRI. The remainder of the
    upper abdomen appeared normal. The laparoscope was then removed from the port
    and the remaining instruments were all removed. The ports were then removed
    from the abdomen. The umbilical port and right lateral port sites fascia were
    reapproximated with 0 Vicryl with a single figure-of-eight stitch. The
    subcutaneous tissue of these ports were reapproximated with 3-0 Vicryl in an
    interrupted fashion. All remaining ports skin were closed with 4-0 Monocryl in
    a subcuticular fashion. Steri-Strips and bandages were applied to each site.
    Attention was then turned to the vagina where the speculum was inserted and the
    HUMI was removed. Cervix was hemostatic. The speculum was removed. Foley
    catheter was then removed. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Sponge,
    lap and needle counts were correct x3. The patient was awakened from general
    anesthesia and taken to the recovery room in stable condition.

  2. The appropriate CPT code for Tubal Ligation reversal is 58750, but 58750 is an open procedure (not laparoscopic).
    ***
    For “Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation reversal” you can use 58679 (unlisted laparoscopic procedure, Oviduct, Ovary)along with the operative note.

  3. All robotic surgeries are coded as laparoscopic procedures - physicians are not paid more because they use the Robot. So you have to find the code for this procedure: tubal reanastomosis (or in CPT language, it is a tubotubal anastomosis). There is only one for the open procedure, 58750, but under CPT rules if a procedure is done laparoscopically but there is no specific code, you must use the unlisted laparoscopic code which in this case would be 58679. The payer will have to know how much to pay so you let them know that the work is equivalent to 58750. You can add a secondary code of S2900 (Robot used), but this code is for informational purposes only - no reimbursement will be given. Your diagnosis for this surgery will be V26.0.
    Hope this helps.

  4. Thank-you

Share |

RSS feed for this Question

To Post Your Question
Subscribe to SuperCoder Ask An Expert
Already a
SuperCoder Member