Ask an Expert Answers to Compliance and Medical Coding Questions.
  1. User id : 30174 Posted 2 years ago

    Regarding deep dermis/skin closure. Would this ever be considered layered when deep subcu not mentioned? Also,
    since this was a mass but not a tumor, would this be totally integumentary (11406) instead of a musculoskeletal code (tibial muscle was mentioned)?
    Based on path, would the diagnosis code 709.3 or 782.2?

    Preop/Postop Diagnosis: Left Leg Mass (Suspect Gouty Tophaceous Deposit)

    Path: Polarizable crystal deposits consistent with gout

    The skin was incised sharply and then skin sharply dissected off the
    underlying mass which was immediately apparent after penetrating the
    deep dermis. The mass was multilobulated with rock-hard induration
    in many places. Sharp dissection technique was used to get around the mass and develop a plan between it and the underlying tibial
    musculature. The deep dermis as then approximated with buried
    interrupted sutures of 2-0 Vicryl and the skin closed with simple
    interrupted sutures of 4-0 nylon.

  2. SuperCoder Posted 2 years ago

    27632 is the correct code for the Px mentioned. The mass is in the SUBQ(not intervening in the muscle) which involves dermis. Dx would be 782.2

  3. User id : 30174 Posted 2 years ago

    Since this is a mass and not a tumor, would this code be appropriate? 782.2 is not an approved code for
    27632 for some reason. But neither is 709.3. Do you have any ideas?

    And regarding deep dermis/skin closures, would this ever be considered layered since the intermediate closure
    specifies deep subcu?

  4. SuperCoder Posted 2 years ago

    Deep dermis/skin closure in your case can be considered as Intermediate as subQ invloves deep dermis. This is a judgement call. Regarding the Dx you can use 239.2 for that.

About this Question

  • Posted by 30174, 2 years ago. There are 4 posts. The latest reply is from SuperCoder.